Skip to main content

ESC is an alliance of European organisations that strives to reduce the impact of
modern communications and electricity use on health and the environment.
We are not against technology, but we are pro safe technology and safe connections.

International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields

Press Conference Video Release: Wireless Radiation And Public Health: What The WHO Reviews Reveal—And Don’t

ICBE-EMF Scientists Challenge WHO-Commissioned Reviews on Wireless Radiation Safety

The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) released a video of their press conference where scientists shared their latest paper, “The WHO-Commissioned Systematic Reviews on Health Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation Provide No Assurance of Safety,” in the journal Environmental Health. The paper critically examines the World Health Organization (WHO)-commissioned systematic reviews on the health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation, identifying significant flaws that undermine their conclusions regarding safety.

RF radiation, a type of non-ionizing electromagnetic field (EMF), is emitted by ubiquitous wireless devices and telecommunications infrastructure, including cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and building-mounted antennas.  

Speakers:

  • John Frank MD:  ICBE-EMF Chairperson; physician and epidemiologist, University of Edinburgh; Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto
  • Ron Melnick Ph.D: Past Chair, ICBE-EMF; Senior Advisor; former Senior Toxicologist, National Toxicology Program (NTP), NIEHS
  • Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe, BM (UK Medical Degree) : ICBE-EMF Special Expert; physician; founder, Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment
  • Joel Moskowitz Ph.D.: ICBE-EMF Commissioner; Director, Center for Family and Community Health, University of California, Berkeley
  • Elizabeth Kelley, MA: ICBE-EMF Managing Director; President of the Board, Electromagnetic Safety Alliance

Dr. John Frank, a physician and epidemiologist at the University of Edinburgh, Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto, and ICBE-EMF Chairperson, stated, “We at ICBE-EMF find, based on our substantial, collective, multidisciplinary expertise in this field, that the WHO-commissioned systematic reviews are simply inadequate to conclude that wireless radiation is safe or that ICNIRP/FCC limits are reliable. Presenting these flawed reviews as evidence of safety for ICNIRP and the FCC’s current exposure limits would mislead the public.”

The paper was authored by Ronald L. Melnick, Joel M. Moskowitz, Paul Héroux, Erica Mallery-Blythe, Martha Herbert, Lennart Hardell, Alasdair Philips, Fiorella Belpoggi, John W. Frank,  Theodora Scarato & Elizabeth Kelley on behalf of  ICBE-EMF as well as by Julie E. McCredden of the Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association.

Watch the video replay of the press conference here.

Read the full press release here. 

Concerns Over Bias and Flawed Methodology

A central concern highlighted in the ICBE-EMF paper is the extensive involvement of individuals affiliated with the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in the production of these WHO-commissioned reviews. ICNIRP and the WHO’s EMF Program share a common origin and have historically maintained that thermal effects are the only established health risks of RF radiation exposure. Given that ICNIRP’s recommended RF radiation exposure limits have been adopted by most countries for the past 30 years, the ICBE-EMF is raising questions regarding potential bias in these reviews and the adequacy of current exposure limits for protecting public health.

Dr. Ron Melnick, past Chair of the ICBE-EMF, now Senior Advisor and former senior toxicologist at the National Toxicology Program and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), elaborated on their findings. “We began reviewing the WHO-commissioned assessments because of our longstanding involvement in this research and the potential influence these reviews could have on future policy decisions,” said Dr. Melnick. “We uncovered numerous flaws, including the exclusion of relevant studies, reliance on weak studies, inappropriate combining of studies with vastly different exposure conditions, and undisclosed biases among the authors.”

Evidence of Harm and Need for Stronger Protections

The ICBE-EMF paper specifically notes that the WHO-commissioned systematic reviews on cancer and reproductive effects in experimental animals indicated a high certainty of association between RF radiation exposure and increased incidences of heart schwannomas and reduced male fertility. Furthermore, these reviews provided quantitative data that, according to the ICBE-EMF, could and should be used to reduce exposure limits and improve protection for humans.  

Dr. Joel Moskowitz, Director of the Center for Family and Community Health at the University of California, Berkeley, further emphasized the analytical weaknesses. “Eleven of the twelve WHO-sponsored systematic reviews relied upon multiple quantitative analyses (meta-analyses) of primary studies on RF radiation health effects. In most instances, we found that these analyses had serious methodological weaknesses that undermined interpretation of the results and invalidated the authors’ conclusions, which were based upon these results,” stated Dr. Moskowitz.

The ICBE-EMF has previously published work demonstrating how scientific evidence over the past three decades invalidates many assumptions underlying ICNIRP’s RF radiation exposure limits. With mounting scientific evidence and widespread, increasing population exposure to RF radiation, the ICBE-EMF stresses the urgent need to reduce exposures and strengthen safety limits, particularly for vulnerable populations such as pregnant individuals, children, and those with chronic health conditions, including electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

The ICBE-EMF concludes that the WHO-commissioned systematic reviews do not provide proof of safety for cell phones or other wireless communication devices, nor do they justify the RF radiation exposure limits currently specified in ICNIRP’s guidelines. The organization calls for urgently needed, science-based public health guidelines that are genuinely protective of human health and the environment.

About the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF):

ICBE-EMF is an international consortium of scientists, doctors, and researchers with expertise and peer-reviewed publications on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields, including wireless RF radiation. Wireless devices such as cell phones, cordless phones, Wi-Fi, and cell towers emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation. The Commission is committed to upholding the highest standards of scientific research and makes science-based recommendations to ensure the protection of the public and the environment. ICBE-EMF.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

The Europeans for Safe Connections (“we”) treats your personal data confidentially in compliance with the legal requirements of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the GDPR). You do not provide us with any personal data in the ordinary browsing of the esc-info.eu ("website"). We only collect information that is insufficient to identify a person, but allows us to track simple statistics. View more
Cookies settings
Accept
Decline
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active
The Europeans for Safe Connections (“we”) treats your personal data confidentially in compliance with the legal requirements of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the General Data Protection Regulation).

Website

We are responsible for operating www.esc-info.eu (the “site”). During ordinary viewing, you can use these without providing us with personal information. We only collect information that is insufficient to identify a person but allows us to have an overview of simple statistics:
  • your browser programme’s name and its version,
  • your device’s operating system,
  • the (anonymised) IP-address of your device,
  • the exact time of your request,
  • the URL-address of the requested file or page,
  • the address of the website which pointed to our site (the Referrer URL),
  • the result of your request (the HTTP Status Code).
The site does not collect any information from social networks. If you click one of social media links you are redirected to those websites and there they collect themselves. If you will contact us via the contact form or subscribe to our newsletters, your name and email address will be recorded. In case of need to cancel the subscription to our newsletters, you can do so via the Unsubscribe link located in the footer of each newsletter, this will remove your name and email address from the system.
Save settings
Cookies settings